The All Progressives Congress has dismissed claims that a Canadian court labelled the party a terrorist organisation.
In a statement issued on Friday, APCâs National Publicity Secretary, Felix Morka, clarified that the court made no pronouncement on terrorism in its ruling.
This follows reports by some media outlets on Thursday (excluding The PUNCH) alleging that the Canadian court had declared both the APC and the Peoples Democratic Party as terrorist organisations.
APC called on its members, supporters, and Nigerians at large to disregard the reports, describing them as false and misleading.
The ruling party stated, âWe wish to state categorically that the Canadian court did not declare APC as a terrorist organisation, contrary to highly erroneous media reports in circulation.
âAs reported, the declaration was allegedly made in the case of Douglas Egharevba and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, in which the applicant (Douglas Egharevba) sought judicial review of a decision by the Canadian Immigration Appeal Division [IAD] which determined that the applicant was inadmissible in Canada under its Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).
âIn a decision in the matter dated June 17, 2025, Judge Phuong T.V. Ngo dismissed the application for judicial review on the ground that the qpplicant was a member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and that the PDP was an organisation engaged in acts of subversion pursuant to paragraph 34(1)(b.1) of the IRPA making him inadmissible in Canada.
âIn his analysis, the judge stated, âAs such, applying the reasonableness standard of review, I cannot find the IADâs conclusion that the elections in question constituted a democratic process or institution and that the PDP, its members and supporters engaged in subversive acts committed against the electoral process for the improper purpose of maintaining political power to be unreasonable.’â
Morka stressed that claims of a Canadian court declaring the APC a terrorist organisation are blatantly false and, at best, deliberately misleading.
He explained that, âTo be clear, the only reference to APC in the entire 16-paged decision was in the introductory Background, Paragraph 4, where the court referenced a Background Declaration Form in which the applicant stated that âhe was a member of the Peopleâs Democratic Party [PDP] of Nigeria from December 1999 until December 2007, and a member of All Progressives Congress [APC] party of Nigeria from December 2007 until May 2017.â
âFor the record, APC was not in existence as of 2007. The party was registered in 2013. The applicantâs claim of membership of APC as of 2007 is evidently false as he could not have been a member of APC that didnât exist at the time.
âFor the avoidance of doubt, we make bold to state that the court never made any determination on the question of terrorism in its decision.â
The APC further noted that any such decision would have been entirely meaningless, as it would lack jurisdiction and hold no extraterritorial relevance or legal effect.
The statement read in part, âClearly, reports that APC was declared as a terrorist organisation by the Canadian court in this matter is patently erroneous, if not mischievous.
âThe court did not make such a declaration, and could not have done so as that would be an unjustifiable overreach, and a major breach of fair hearing, among other due process rights, given that APC was not a party to the proceedings.
âSuch a decision would also have been of absolute irrelevance as being made without jurisdiction, and of no extraterritorial applicability or significance.â