Wednesday, 17 Sep 2025
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
Subscribe
Newsgrasp
  • Home
  • Today’s News
  • World
  • US
  • Nigeria News
  • Politics
  • 🔥
  • Today's News
  • US
  • World
  • Nigeria News
  • Politics
  • Donald Trump
  • Israel
  • President Donald Trump
  • White House
  • President Trump
Font ResizerAa
NewsgraspNewsgrasp
Search
  • Home
  • Today’s News
  • World
  • US
  • Nigeria News
  • Politics
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
2025 © Newsgrasp. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo news home
PoliticsToday's News

MAGA debates how to respond to Kirk’s killing

Myah Ward
Last updated: September 17, 2025 1:29 am
Myah Ward
Share
SHARE

The MAGA movement is divided over how to respond to the killing of Charlie Kirk.

Some of the president’s aides and allies have floated a crackdown on “hate speech” they believe fuels political violence, while others, pointing to Kirk’s defense of the First Amendment, have focused on NGOs and left-wing groups they say have long funded violence against Republicans and law enforcement officials.

The varying approaches demonstrate how nearly a week after President Donald Trump called for targeting organizations and blamed the “radical left” for the killing, the policy response is still very much in flux.

“There are a wide range of options on the table,” said a White House official, granted anonymity to speak about ongoing policy discussions.

And the debate over how far to go underscores the tension on the right as the administration works to channel the outrage over Kirk’s death into a tangible policy response without running afoul free-speech champions inside the GOP.

The White House official said discussions are focused on targeting “organizations that are inciting or funding or organizing violence,” including launching investigations into groups and revoking tax exempt status for those accused of orchestrating illegal doxxing campaigns and arranging drop points for weapons and riot materials. The official pointed to attacks on Tesla dealerships and against immigration officials as examples.

“It’s not about speech,” the official said. “It’s about violence and criminal actions.”

Still, some Republicans questioned how far social media users should be allowed to go in their rhetoric, with Vice President JD Vance suggesting people call the employers’ of those celebrated or make light of Kirk’s killing.

The debate escalated on Tuesday when Attorney General Pam Bondi walked back her vow that the Justice Department would go after anyone who uses hate speech to target others, saying “there’s free speech, and then there’s hate speech.” The comments faced steep backlash from both liberals and conservatives, and Bondi quickly clarified that she was referring to “hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence.” But that did little to tame some Trump allies who said her words went directly against Kirk’s beliefs.

“The First Amendment absolutely protects speech,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said Tuesday at POLITICO’s AI & Tech Summit in Washington. “It absolutely protects hate speech. It protects vile speech. It protects horrible speech. What does that mean? It means you cannot be prosecuted for speech, even if it is evil and bigoted and wrong.”

Other top administration officials, including FCC chair Brendan Carr, were quick to reject the idea of a crackdown on online discourse.

“I think you can draw a pretty clear line, and the Supreme Court has done this for decades, that our First Amendment, our free speech tradition, protects almost all speech,” Carr said at the POLITICO AI & Tech Summit.

Steve Bannon, the former Trump strategist and War Room podcast host, told POLITICO the administration is considering a number of actions, including designating “antifa,” a loose term used to describe far-left anti-fascism activists, domestic terrorists. He also said the administration is looking at declaring martial law in a part of Portland, Oregon, in response to protests, and investigating left-wing groups and others who conservatives accuse of funding political violence.

“The biggest thing is to broaden the assassination investigation from a single murder to the broader conspiracy,” Bannon said. “If we are going to go to war, let’s go to war.”

The White House official said the administration is not limiting itself at this point.

Authorities on Tuesday charged Tyler Robinson, 22, with aggravated murder, discharging a firearm and obstruction of justice. Robinson could face the death penalty.

Investigators are still working to confirm a motive in the death of Kirk, as Trump and his allies suggest the suspect, Robinson, is part of a coordinated movement on the left driving violence against conservatives. The country has recently seen a wave of political violence targeting members of both parties.

Vance said the administration’s crackdown would be focused on “radical left lunatics,” suggesting the early targets could be The Ford Foundation and the Open Society Foundations, the nonprofit run by Democratic megadonor George Soros.

Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who has suggested the administration would use the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security to go after leftist “terror” networks who organize doxxing campaigns, violent street protests among other actions, told reporters Monday that the vice president was talking about a “whole network of organizations.”

“The key point the president has been making, somebody is paying for all of this. This is not happening for free,” Miller said. “So under the president’s direction, the attorney general is going to find out who is paying for it and they will be criminally liable for paying for violence.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

TAGGED:Administration officialsCharlie Kirkfree speechhate speechLaw enforcement officialspolitical violencePresident Donald TrumpTyler RobinsonVice President JD VanceWhite House
Share This Article
Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Yahoo news home Justice Department says it’s suing Oregon and Maine as it seeks voter data in multiple states
Next Article Yahoo news home Colombian FARC leaders ordered to make reparations for over 21,000 kidnappings
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Trusted Source for Accurate and Timely Updates!

Our commitment to accuracy, impartiality, and delivering breaking news as it happens has earned us the trust of a vast audience. Stay ahead with real-time updates on the latest events, trends.
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
LinkedInFollow
MediumFollow
QuoraFollow
- Advertisement -
Ad image

You Might Also Like

Yahoo news home
PoliticsToday's News

Texas Democrats receive bomb threat in escalating standoff over redistricting

By Sam Levine
Yahoo news home
Today's NewsUS

Multiple fatalities reported in tourist bus crash in New York state

By Guardian staff
Budget Office of the Federation
Nigeria NewsToday's News

Nigeria’s 2024 Capital Budget: MDAs Spend Only 25%

By Sami Tunji
Yahoo news home
Today's NewsUS

No more soda or candy. Here’s when it takes effect

By Doris Alvarez Cea, Jacksonville Florida Times-Union
Newsgrasp
Facebook Twitter Youtube Rss Medium

About US


Newsgrasp Live News: Your instant connection to breaking stories and live updates. Stay informed with our real-time coverage across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. Your reliable source for 24/7 news.

Top Categories
  • Home
  • Today’s News
  • World
  • US
  • Nigeria News
  • Politics
Usefull Links
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with US
  • Complaint
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer

2025 ©️ Newsgrasp. All Right Reserved 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

%d